<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Philosophy of Being &#187; Categories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philofbeing.com/tag/categories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philofbeing.com</link>
	<description>A University of Dallas Course by Taylor Marshall</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:47:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Aristotle’s Ten Categories</title>
		<link>http://philofbeing.com/2009/07/aristotle%e2%80%99s-ten-categories/</link>
		<comments>http://philofbeing.com/2009/07/aristotle%e2%80%99s-ten-categories/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Marshall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Aristotle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Categories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Substance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philofbeing.com/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Substances are unique in that they are independent. The other nine categories are “accidental.” These nine categories each depend on substances and can’t exist on their own, e.g. redness, double, smallness, etc.
1.    Substance (ousia, &#8220;essence” or &#8220;substance”). Substance is defined as that which neither can be predicated of anything nor be said to be in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Substances are unique in that they are independent. The other nine categories are “accidental.” These nine categories each depend on substances and can’t exist on their own, e.g. redness, double, smallness, etc.</p>
<p>1.    Substance (ousia, &#8220;essence” or &#8220;substance”). Substance is defined as that which neither can be predicated of anything nor be said to be in anything. Hence, this particular man or that particular tree are substances. Later in the text, Aristotle calls these particulars “primary substances”, to distinguish them from secondary substances, which are universals and can be predicated. Hence, Socrates is a primary substance, while man is a secondary substance. Man is predicated of Socrates, and therefore all that is predicated of man is predicated of Socrates.<br />
2.    Quantity (poson, “how much”). This is the extension of an object, and may be either discrete or continuous. Further, its parts may or may not have relative positions to each other. All medieval discussions about the nature of the continuum, of the infinite and the infinitely divisible, are a long footnote to this text. It is of great importance in the development of mathematical ideas in the medieval and late Scholastic period.<br />
3.    Quality (poion, “of what kind or quality”). This is a determination which characterizes the nature of an object.<br />
4.    Relation (pros ti, “toward something”). This is the way in which one object may be related to another.<br />
5.    Place (pou, “where”). Position in relation to the surrounding environment.<br />
6.    Time (pote, “when”). Position in relation to the course of events.<br />
7.    Position (keisthai, “to lie”). The examples Aristotle gives indicate that he meant a condition of rest resulting from an action: ‘Lying’, ‘sitting’. Thus position may be taken as the end point for the corresponding action. The term is, however, frequently taken to mean the relative position of the parts of an object (usually a living object), given that the position of the parts is inseparable from the state of rest implied.<br />
8.    State or habitus (echein, “to have”). The examples Aristotle gives indicate that he meant a condition of rest resulting from an affection (i.e. being acted on): ‘shod’, ‘armed’. The term is, however, frequently taken to mean the determination arising from the physical accoutrements of an object: one&#8217;s shoes, one&#8217;s arms, etc. Traditionally, this category is also called a habitus (from Latin habere, “to have”).<br />
9.    Action (poiein, &#8220;to make” or &#8220;to do”). The production of change in some other object.<br />
10.    Affection (paschein, “to suffer” or “to undergo”). The reception of change from some other object. It is also known as passivity. It is clear from the examples Aristotle gave for action and for affection that action is to affection as the active voice is to the passive. Thus for action he gave the example, ‘to lance’, ‘to cauterize’; for affection, ‘to be lanced’, ‘to be cauterized.’ The term is frequently misinterpreted to mean a kind of emotion or passion.</p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Categories</th>
<th>Aristotle&#8217;s Term</th>
<th>Greek</th>
<th>Examples</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Substance/Essence</td>
<td>&#8220;substance&#8221;<br />
&#8220;this&#8221;<br />
&#8220;what-it-is&#8221;</td>
<td><em>ousia</em><br />
<em>tode ti</em><br />
<em>ti esti</em></td>
<td>man, horse<br />
Socrates<br />
&#8220;Socrates is a man&#8221;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Quantity</td>
<td>How much</td>
<td><em>poson</em></td>
<td>four-foot, five-foot</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Quality</td>
<td>What sort</td>
<td><em>poion</em></td>
<td>white, literate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Relation</td>
<td align="left">related to what</td>
<td><em>pros ti</em></td>
<td>double, half, greater</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Location</td>
<td>Where</td>
<td><em>pou</em></td>
<td>in the Lyceum, in the marketplace</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Time</td>
<td>When</td>
<td><em>pote</em></td>
<td>yesterday, last year</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Position</td>
<td>Being situated</td>
<td><em>keisthai</em></td>
<td>lies, sits</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Habit</td>
<td>Having, possession</td>
<td><em>echein</em></td>
<td>is shod, is armed</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Action</td>
<td>Doing</td>
<td><em>poiein</em></td>
<td>cuts, burns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Passion</td>
<td>Undergoing</td>
<td><em>paschein</em></td>
<td>is cut, is burned</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3><a name="MetDiv"></a></h3>
<p>List modified from <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-logic/">Robin Smith&#8217;s excellent article &#8220;Aristotle&#8217;s Logic&#8221; from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://philofbeing.com/2009/07/aristotle%e2%80%99s-ten-categories/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
