<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Philosophy of Being</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philofbeing.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philofbeing.com</link>
	<description>by Dr. Taylor Marshall of the College of Saint Thomas More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 20:10:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Understanding the Third Man Argument by Henry utley md,phd</title>
		<link>http://philofbeing.com/2009/09/understanding-the-third-man-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry utley md,phd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 20:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philofbeing.com/?p=24#comment-308</guid>
		<description>A difficult concept til your explanation.      You must be a gifted teacher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A difficult concept til your explanation.      You must be a gifted teacher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scholarship on Plato&#8217;s Unwritten Dogmas or Doctrines by Omar Mounts</title>
		<link>http://philofbeing.com/2009/10/scholarship-on-platos-unwritten-dogmas-or-doctrines/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Omar Mounts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philofbeing.com/?p=86#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Awesome post.Really thank you! Really Great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome post.Really thank you! Really Great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aristotle&#8217;s 5 Predicables Explained by bob</title>
		<link>http://philofbeing.com/2011/09/aristotles-5-predicables-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 17:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philofbeing.com/?p=112#comment-306</guid>
		<description>can you please explain the difference between #3 differentia and #1 the species.  
it sounds like they both refer to the specific difference, or is it the case that the species is stated as a substance and the differentia is something between an accident and a property (i.e. differentia is not Inconsequential like an accident, but it doesn&#039;t flow from the essence like a property)?
or is #1 the species just the result of combining #2 the genus with #3 the differentia?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can you please explain the difference between #3 differentia and #1 the species.<br />
it sounds like they both refer to the specific difference, or is it the case that the species is stated as a substance and the differentia is something between an accident and a property (i.e. differentia is not Inconsequential like an accident, but it doesn&#8217;t flow from the essence like a property)?<br />
or is #1 the species just the result of combining #2 the genus with #3 the differentia?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Thematic Outline of Plato&#8217;s Republic by Jannel</title>
		<link>http://philofbeing.com/2009/07/thematic-outline-of-platos-republic/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Jannel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 09:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philofbeing.com/?p=8#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Nice post. I was checking continuously this blog and I am impressed! Extremely useful info specially the last part :) I care for such info much. I was looking for this certain information for a very long time. Thank you and best of luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post. I was checking continuously this blog and I am impressed! Extremely useful info specially the last part <img src='http://philofbeing.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I care for such info much. I was looking for this certain information for a very long time. Thank you and best of luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Did Plato Have an Unwritten Doctrine? by Michelle</title>
		<link>http://philofbeing.com/2009/09/did-plato-have-an-unwritten-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philofbeing.com/?p=61#comment-209</guid>
		<description>So the symbol for this is a circle, a straight line, and two smaller circles on the other side of the line, right?
My take on that is the line is the One in the invisible realm, and dualism in the visible.  The dualism being the ghost in-a-machine type of doctrine, as when Plato has Socrates speak of soul and body in terms of body and clothes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the symbol for this is a circle, a straight line, and two smaller circles on the other side of the line, right?<br />
My take on that is the line is the One in the invisible realm, and dualism in the visible.  The dualism being the ghost in-a-machine type of doctrine, as when Plato has Socrates speak of soul and body in terms of body and clothes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Understanding the Third Man Argument by Michelle</title>
		<link>http://philofbeing.com/2009/09/understanding-the-third-man-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philofbeing.com/?p=24#comment-208</guid>
		<description>But Plato did not mention Clinton, Bush, and Obama!  Who&#039;s the third man?  Who are the first and second men? Why don&#039;t we just call it the Argument of Infinite Regress, or the Argument of Superforms?&gt;0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Plato did not mention Clinton, Bush, and Obama!  Who&#8217;s the third man?  Who are the first and second men? Why don&#8217;t we just call it the Argument of Infinite Regress, or the Argument of Superforms?&gt;0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Outline of Aristotle&#8217;s Metaphysics by Metaphysics</title>
		<link>http://philofbeing.com/2009/10/outline-of-aristotles-metaphysics/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Metaphysics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 05:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philofbeing.com/?p=78#comment-207</guid>
		<description>[...]Trackback posted to this site from... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]Trackback posted to this site from&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guide to the Pre-Socratics by Regina Inglin</title>
		<link>http://philofbeing.com/2009/09/guide-to-the-pre-socratics/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Regina Inglin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philofbeing.com/?p=53#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Cool website Dr Marshall!  I agree with Mark on this one:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool website Dr Marshall!  I agree with Mark on this one:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guide to the Pre-Socratics by Mark Nelson</title>
		<link>http://philofbeing.com/2009/09/guide-to-the-pre-socratics/comment-page-1/#comment-205</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philofbeing.com/?p=53#comment-205</guid>
		<description>This is going to be a great class this semester!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is going to be a great class this semester!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guide to the Pre-Socratics by Tyler</title>
		<link>http://philofbeing.com/2009/09/guide-to-the-pre-socratics/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 23:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philofbeing.com/?p=53#comment-204</guid>
		<description>I think we should stop using the word politicians and replace it with sophists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we should stop using the word politicians and replace it with sophists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

