<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Philosophy of Being &#187; Unwritten Doctrine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philofbeing.com/category/plato/unwritten-doctrine-plato/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philofbeing.com</link>
	<description>by Dr. Taylor Marshall of the College of Saint Thomas More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:02:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Scholarship on Plato&#8217;s Unwritten Dogmas or Doctrines</title>
		<link>http://philofbeing.com/2009/10/scholarship-on-platos-unwritten-dogmas-or-doctrines/</link>
		<comments>http://philofbeing.com/2009/10/scholarship-on-platos-unwritten-dogmas-or-doctrines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 19:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Marshall</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Neo-Platonism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plotinus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unwritten Doctrine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aristotle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philofbeing.com/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cornelia J. de Vogel, H.J. Kramer, and others have focused their attentions on the so-called unwritten doctrines of Plato. This perspective is often called the &#8220;Tubingen-Heidelberg&#8221; school of Plato.
Far from seeing Neo-Platonism as a far-fetched corruption of Plato&#8217;s thought, these thinkers emphasize the continuity between Plato and his traditional interpreters (e.g. Plotinus).
The term &#8220;unwritten doctrine&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cornelia J. de Vogel, H.J. Kramer, and others have focused their attentions on the so-called unwritten doctrines of Plato. This perspective is often called the &#8220;Tubingen-Heidelberg&#8221; school of Plato.</p>
<p>Far from seeing Neo-Platonism as a far-fetched corruption of Plato&#8217;s thought, these thinkers emphasize the continuity between Plato and his traditional interpreters (e.g. Plotinus).</p>
<p>The term &#8220;unwritten doctrine&#8221; or &#8220;unwritten dogma&#8221; comes from Aristotle&#8217;s Physics</p>
<blockquote><p>“It is true, indeed, that the account he gives there of the participant is different from what he [Plato] says in his so-called unwritten teaching (<em>agrapha dogmata</em>).” &#8211; Aristotle, Physics 209b</p></blockquote>
<p>This secret teaching conforms to something said by Plato in his Seventh Letter:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Every serious man in dealing with really serious subjects carefully avoids writing” (344c).</p></blockquote>
<p>What are the so-called &#8220;unwritten doctrines&#8221;? Aristotle explains it as amounting to the teaching of the &#8220;One and the Dyad.&#8221; To this is often added the &#8220;third hypostasis&#8221; of Plotinus, which is &#8220;nous&#8221; or &#8220;intellect.&#8221;</p>
<p>Those that favor this interpretation of Plato often see Platonism as reconcilable to Christianity.</p>
<p>Pertinent dialogues to this debate are: Republic, Timaeus, Parmenides, Philebus, Phaedrus, Phaedo and Epistle 7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://philofbeing.com/2009/10/scholarship-on-platos-unwritten-dogmas-or-doctrines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

