“The safest general characterization of the European philosophical tradition is that it consists of a series of footnotes to Plato.”
Alfred North Whitehead, Process and Reality (Free Press, 1969) p. 53.
_______________________
BILL MURRAY: “What did you study?”
SCARLETT JOHANSSON: “Philosophy.”
BILL MURRAY: “Yeah, there’s a good buck in that racket.”
SCARLETT JOHANSSON: “Well, so far it’s pro bono.”
Lost in Translation (2003)

Pre 1930’s this may have been arguable. Post 1930’s, I wonder.
Surely he should have seen this from his mathematics. With the collapse of Hilbert’s dream to reason out the universe he should have realised that others have tried to pick up the philosophical pieces. They have seen that there are issues far beyond Plato’s analysis.
Personally, I think Plato got it wrong in assuming the law of non contradiction. To blindly assume it (or see it as an axiom ) leaves a shaky credibility.
A person created in God’s image, with the ability to know what God reveals, is in a critically different position. Then, and only then, is the Law of Non Contradiction given its proper place.