Comments on: Understanding the Third Man Argument http://philofbeing.com/2009/09/understanding-the-third-man-argument/ A University of Dallas Course by Taylor Marshall Sun, 15 Aug 2010 08:37:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Taylor Marshall http://philofbeing.com/2009/09/understanding-the-third-man-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-44 Taylor Marshall Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:08:08 +0000 http://philofbeing.com/?p=24#comment-44 Mr. Mondragon, So are you inferring that the Hen or Monad of Plotinus is the Form of all? Remember, the Third Man Argument isn't simply infinite regress, but that each particular form would regress infinitely based on the definition of "participation." Amal, Thank you. Welcome the site! Metaphysically, Taylor Marshall Mr. Mondragon,

So are you inferring that the Hen or Monad of Plotinus is the Form of all? Remember, the Third Man Argument isn’t simply infinite regress, but that each particular form would regress infinitely based on the definition of “participation.”

Amal,

Thank you. Welcome the site!

Metaphysically,
Taylor Marshall

]]> By: Amal http://philofbeing.com/2009/09/understanding-the-third-man-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-43 Amal Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:50:17 +0000 http://philofbeing.com/?p=24#comment-43 I'm not in your class but I love this blog :D It makes Philosophy a lot less intimidating. Thanks! I’m not in your class but I love this blog :D It makes Philosophy a lot less intimidating. Thanks!

]]> By: Christian Mondragon http://philofbeing.com/2009/09/understanding-the-third-man-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-41 Christian Mondragon Wed, 04 Nov 2009 21:04:20 +0000 http://philofbeing.com/?p=24#comment-41 Methinks, after reading about Plotinus and "The One", that there cannot be a third man argument. If there is one divine being that is the simple explanation of everything then there is no infinite regress. Methinks, after reading about Plotinus and “The One”, that there cannot be a third man argument. If there is one divine being that is the simple explanation of everything then there is no infinite regress.

]]> By: Joe Z http://philofbeing.com/2009/09/understanding-the-third-man-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-37 Joe Z Wed, 21 Oct 2009 02:51:35 +0000 http://philofbeing.com/?p=24#comment-37 still foggy on this still foggy on this

]]> By: Taylor Marshall http://philofbeing.com/2009/09/understanding-the-third-man-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-32 Taylor Marshall Mon, 07 Sep 2009 19:18:07 +0000 http://philofbeing.com/?p=24#comment-32 Don't worry. We'll make it less confusing when we cover it in class. Don’t worry. We’ll make it less confusing when we cover it in class.

]]> By: Danielle Fuchs http://philofbeing.com/2009/09/understanding-the-third-man-argument/comment-page-1/#comment-31 Danielle Fuchs Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:18:27 +0000 http://philofbeing.com/?p=24#comment-31 geez, philosophy is sooooo confusing! :) geez, philosophy is sooooo confusing! :)

]]>