<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Plato Have an Unwritten Doctrine?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philofbeing.com/2009/09/did-plato-have-an-unwritten-doctrine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philofbeing.com/2009/09/did-plato-have-an-unwritten-doctrine/</link>
	<description>by Dr. Taylor Marshall of the College of Saint Thomas More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 20:10:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://philofbeing.com/2009/09/did-plato-have-an-unwritten-doctrine/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 20:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philofbeing.com/?p=61#comment-209</guid>
		<description>So the symbol for this is a circle, a straight line, and two smaller circles on the other side of the line, right?
My take on that is the line is the One in the invisible realm, and dualism in the visible.  The dualism being the ghost in-a-machine type of doctrine, as when Plato has Socrates speak of soul and body in terms of body and clothes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the symbol for this is a circle, a straight line, and two smaller circles on the other side of the line, right?<br />
My take on that is the line is the One in the invisible realm, and dualism in the visible.  The dualism being the ghost in-a-machine type of doctrine, as when Plato has Socrates speak of soul and body in terms of body and clothes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

